The Constitution of India (IAST: Bhāratīya Saṃvidhāna) is the supreme law of India.^[1][2] The document lays down the framework demarcating fundamental political code, structure, procedures, powers, and duties of government institutions and sets out fundamental rights, directive principles, and the duties of citizens. It is the longest written constitution of any country on earth.^[b][3][4][5]B. R. Ambedkar, chairman of the drafting committee, is widely considered to be its chief architect.^[6]

It imparts constitutional supremacy (not parliamentary supremacy, since it was created by a constituent assembly rather than Parliament) and was adopted by its people with a declaration in its preamble.^{[7][full citation needed]} Parliament cannot override the constitution.

It was adopted by the Constituent Assembly of India on 26 November 1949 and became effective on 26 January 1950.^[8] The constitution replaced the Government of India Act, 1935 as the country's fundamental governing document, and the Dominion of India became the Republic of India. To ensure constitutional autochthony, its framers repealed prior acts of the British parliament in Article 395.^[9] India celebrates its constitution on 26 January as Republic Day.^[10]

The constitution declares India a sovereign, socialist, secular,^[11]democraticrepublic, assuring its citizens justice, equality and liberty, and endeavours to promote fraternity.^[12] The original 1950 constitution is preserved in a helium-filled case at the Parliament House in New Delhi. The words 'secular' and 'socialist' were added to the preamble in 1976 during the emergency.^[13]

• 1Background
• 2Constituent Assembly
• 4Structure
• 6Constitution and legislature
• 7Constitution and judiciary
• 10Notes

Background

Most of the Indian subcontinent was under British rule from 1857 to 1947. From 1947 to 1950, the same legislation continued to be implemented as India was a dominion of Britain for these three years, as each princely state was convinced by Sardar Patel and V.P.Menon to sign the articles of integration with India, and the British government continued to be responsible for the external security of the country.^[14] Thus, the constitution of India repealed the Indian Independence Act 1947 and Government of India Act, 1935 when it became effective on 26 January 1950. India ceased to be a dominion of the British Crown and became a sovereign democratic republic with the constitution. Articles 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 60, 324, 366, 367, 379, 380, 388, 391, 392, 393, and 394 of the constitution came into force on 26 November 1949, and the remaining articles became effective on 26 January 1950.^[15]

Previous legislation

The constitution was drawn from a number of sources. Mindful of India's needs and conditions, its framers borrowed features of previous legislation such as the Government of India Act 1858, the Indian Councils Acts of 1861, 1892 and 1909, the Government of India Acts of 1919 and 1935, and the Indian Independence Act 1947. The latter, which led to the creation of India and Pakistan, divided the former Constituent Assembly in two. Each new assembly had sovereign power to draft and enact a new constitution for the separate states.^[16]

Constituent Assembly

The constitution was drafted by the Constituent Assembly, which was elected by elected members of the provincial assemblies.^[17] The 389-member assembly (reduced to 299 after the partition of India) took almost three years to draft the constitution holding eleven sessions over a 165-day period.^[3][16]

B. R. Ambedkar was a wise constitutional expert, he had studied the constitutions of about 60 countries. Ambedkar is recognised as the 'Father of the Constitution of India'.^[18][19] In the constitution assembly, a member of the drafting committee, T. T. Krishnamachari said:

'Mr. President, Sir, I am one of those in the House who have listened to Dr. Ambedkar very carefully. I am aware of the amount of work and enthusiasm that he has brought to bear on the work of drafting this Constitution. At the same time, I do realise that that amount of attention that was necessary for the purpose of drafting a constitution so important to us at this moment has not been given to it by the Drafting Committee. The House is perhaps aware that of the seven members nominated by you, one had resigned from the House and was replaced. One died and was not replaced. One was away in America and his place was not filled up and another person was engaged in State affairs, and there was a void to that extent. One or two people were far away from Delhi and perhaps reasons of health did not permit them to attend. So it happened ultimately that the burden of drafting this constitution fell on Dr. Ambedkar and I have no doubt that we are grateful to him for having achieved this task in a manner which is undoubtedly commendable.'^[20][21]

Time Line of Formation of 'The Constitution of India'

• 6 December 1946:Formation of the Constitution Assembly. (in accordance with French practice.)
• 9 December 1946:The first meeting was held in the constitution hall (now the Central Hall of Parliament House).1st person to address - J.B. kripalani. Temporary president Appointed - Sachchidanand sinha. (Demanding a separate state, the Muslim League boycotted the meeting.)
• 11 December 1946:President Appointed - Rajendra Prasad, vice-Chairman H. C. Mukherjee and constitutional legal adviser B. N. Rau(initially 389 members in total, which declined to 299 after partition. out of 389 - 292 were from govt. province, 4 from chief commissioner province and 93 from princely states)
• 13 December 1946:An 'Objective Resolution' was presented by Jawaharlal Nehru, laying down the underlying principles of the constitution. which later became the Preamble of the constitution.
• 22 January 1947: Objective resolution unanimously adopted.
• 22 July 1947:National flag adopted.
• 15 August 1947: Achieved independence. India Split into Dominion of India and Dominion of Pakistan.
• 29 August 1947:Drafting Committee appointed with Dr. B. R. Ambedkar as the Chairman.other 6 members of committee was : Munshi, Muhammed Sadulla, Allad Krishna swami ayyar, Gopala swami Ayyankar, Khaitan, Mitter
• 16 July 1948: Along with Harendra Coomar MookerjeeV. T. Krishnamachari was also elected as second vice-president of Constituent Assembly.
• 26 November 1949: 'Constitution of India' passed and adopted by the assembly.
• 24 January 1950: Last meeting of Constituent Assembly. 'constitution of india' all signed and accepted. (with 395 Articles, 8 Schedules, 22 Parts)
• 26 January 1950: 'Constitution of India' came in to force. (It Took 2 Years, 11 Months, 18 Days - at a total expenditure of ₹6.4 million to finish)
• G. V. Mavlankar was the first speaker when meeting the assembly of Lok sabha, after turning republic.

Membership

B. R. Ambedkar, Sanjay Phakey, Jawaharlal Nehru, C. Rajagopalachari, Rajendra Prasad, Vallabhbhai Patel, Kanaiyalal Maneklal Munshi, Ganesh Vasudev Mavalankar, Sandipkumar Patel, Abul Kalam Azad, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Nalini Ranjan Ghosh, and Balwantrai Mehta were key figures in the assembly,^[3][16] which had over 30 representatives of the scheduled classes. Frank Anthony represented the Anglo-Indian community,^[3] and the Parsis were represented by H. P. Modi.^[3]Harendra Coomar Mookerjee, a Christian assembly vice-president, chaired the minorities committee and represented non-Anglo-Indian Christians.^[3] Ari Bahadur Gurung represented the Gorkha community.^[3] Judges, such as Alladi Krishnaswamy Iyer, Benegal Narsing Rau, K. M. Munshi and Ganesh Mavlankar were members of the assembly.^[3] Female members included Sarojini Naidu, Hansa Mehta, Durgabai Deshmukh, Amrit Kaur and Vijaya Lakshmi Pandit.^[3]

The first, two-day president of the assembly was Sachchidananda Sinha; Rajendra Prasad was later elected president.^[16][17] It met for the first time on 9 December 1946.^[3][17][13]

Drafting

Benegal Narsing Rau, a civil servant who became the first Indian judge in the International Court of Justice and was president of the United Nations Security Council, was appointed as the assembly's constitutional adviser in 1946.^[22] Responsible for the constitution's general structure, Rau prepared its initial draft in February 1948.^[22][23][24]

At 14 August 1947 meeting of the assembly, committees were proposed.^[17] Rau's draft was considered, debated and amended by the eight-person drafting committee, which was appointed on 29 August 1947 with B. R. Ambedkar as chair.^[3][13] A revised draft constitution was prepared by the committee and submitted to the assembly on 4 November 1947.^[13]

While deliberating the revised draft constitution, the assembly moved, discussed and disposed off 2,473 amendments out of a total of 7,635.^[16][25] Before adopting the constitution, the assembly held eleven sessions in 165 days.^[3][16] On 26 November 1949 it adopted the constitution,^{[3][16][13][24][26]} which was signed by 284 members.^{[3][16][13][24][26]} The day is celebrated as National Law Day,^[3][27] or Constitution Day.^[3][28] The day was chosen to spread the importance of the constitution and to spread thoughts and ideas of Ambedkar.^[29]

The assembly's final session convened on 24 January 1950. Each member signed two copies of the constitution, one in Hindi and the other in English.^[3][16][24] The original constitution is hand-written, with each page decorated by artists from Shantiniketan including Beohar Rammanohar Sinha and Nandalal Bose.^[13][24] Its calligrapher was Prem Behari Narain Raizada.^[13] The constitution was published in Dehradun and photolithographed by the Survey of India. Production of the original constitution took nearly five years. Two days later, on 26 January 1950, it became the law of India.^[13][30] The estimated cost of the Constituent Assembly was ₹6.3 crore (₹63 million).^[16] The constitution has had more than 100 amendments since it was enacted.^[31]

Influence of other constitutions

• United Kingdom
  • Parliamentary government^[3]
  • Concept of single citizenship^[3]
  • The legislative speaker and their role
  • Legislative procedure
• United States^[32]
  • Bill of Rights^[3][13]
  • Federal structure of government^[3]
  • Electoral College
  • Independent judiciary and separation of powers
  • Judicial review
  • President as commander-in-chief of the armed forces
  • Equal protection under law
• Ireland
  • Directive principles of state policy^[13]
• Australia
  • Freedom of trade between states^[16]
  • National legislative power to implement treaties, even on matters outside normal federal jurisdiction
  • Concurrent List^[33]
  • Preamble terminology
• France
  • Ideals of liberté, égalité, fraternité^[3][13]
• Canada
  • Quasi-federal government — a federal system with a strong central government^[16]
  • Distribution of powers between the central and state governments^[3][16]
  • Residual powers, retained by the central government^{[citation needed]}
• Soviet Union
  • Fundamental Duties under article 51-A^[3]
  • Mandated planning commission to oversee economic development^[3]
• Other constitutions
  • The emergency provision under article 356 (from the Weimar Constitution)^[13]
  • Amending the constitution (from South Africa)
  • Due process (from Japan)

Structure

The Indian constitution is the world's longest for a sovereign nation.^[b][3][4][5] At its enactment, it had 395 articles in 22 parts and 8 schedules.^[16] At about 145,000 words, it is the second-longest active constitution – after the Constitution of Alabama – in the world.^[34]

The constitution has a preamble and 448 articles,^[c][13] which are grouped into 25 parts.^[d][13] With 12 schedules^[e][13] and five appendices,^[13][35] it has been amended 103 times; the latest amendment became effective on 14 January 2019.^[36]

Parts

The constitution's articles are grouped into the following parts:

• Preamble,^[37] with the words 'socialist' and 'secular', and 'integrity' added in 1976 by the 42nd amendment^[38][39]
• Part I^[40] – States and union territories
• Part II^[41] – Citizenship
• Part III – Fundamental Rights
• Part IV^[42] – Directive Principles of State Policy
• Part IVA – Fundamental Duties
• Part V^[43] – The union
• Part VI^[44] – The states
• Part VII^[45] – States in the B part of the first schedule (repealed)
• Part VIII^[46] – Union territories
• Part IX^[47] – Panchayats
• Part IXA^[48] – Municipalities
• Part IXB – Co-operative societies^[49]
• Part X – Scheduled and tribal areas
• Part XI – Relations between the union and the states
• Part XII – Finance, property, contracts and suits
• Part XIII – Trade and commerce within India
• Part XIV – Services under the union and states
• Part XIVA – Tribunals
• Part XV – Elections
• Part XVI – Special provisions relating to certain classes
• Part XVII – Languages
• Part XVIII – Emergency provisions
• Part XIX – Miscellaneous
• Part XX – Amending the constitution
• Part XXI – Temporary, transitional and special provisions
• Part XXII – Short title, date of commencement, authoritative text in Hindi and repeals

Schedules

Schedules are lists in the constitution which categorise and tabulate bureaucratic activity and government policy.

• First Schedule (Articles 1 and 4) – Lists India's states and territories, changes in their borders and the laws used to make that change.
• Second Schedule (Articles 59(3), 65(3), 75(6), 97, 125, 148(3), 158(3), 164(5), 186 and 221) – Lists the salaries of public officials, judges, and the Comptroller and Auditor General.
• Third Schedule (Articles 75(4), 99, 124(6), 148(2), 164(3), 188 and 219) – Forms of oaths – Lists the oaths of office for elected officials and judges.
• Fourth Schedule (Articles 4(1) and 80(2)) – Details the allocation of seats in the Rajya Sabha (upper house of Parliament) by state or union territory.
• Fifth Schedule (Article 244(1)) – Provides for the administration and control of Scheduled Areas^[f] and Scheduled Tribes^[g] (areas and tribes requiring special protection).
• Sixth Schedule (Articles 244(2) and 275(1)) – Provisions made for the administration of tribal areas in Assam, Meghalaya, Tripura, and Mizoram.
• Seventh Schedule (Article 246) — Central government, state, and concurrent lists of responsibilities
• Eighth Schedule (Articles 344(1) and 351) – Official languages
• Ninth Schedule (Article 31-B) – Validation of certain acts and regulations^[h]
• Tenth Schedule (Articles 102(2) and 191(2)) – Anti-defection provisions for members of Parliament and state legislatures.
• Eleventh Schedule (Article 243-G) —Panchayat Raj (rural local government)
• Twelfth Schedule (Article 243-W) — Municipalities (urban local government)

Appendices

• Appendix I – The Constitution (Application to Jammu and Kashmir) Order, 1954
• Appendix II – Re-statement, referring to the constitution's present text, of exceptions and modifications applicable to the state of Jammu and Kashmir
• Appendix III – Extracts from the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978
• Appendix IV – The Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002
• Appendix V – The Constitution (Eighty-eighth Amendment) Act, 2003

Constitution and government

The executive, legislative and judicial branches of government receive their power from the constitution and are bound by it.^[50] With the aid of its constitution, India is governed by a parliamentary system of government with the executive directly accountable to the legislature. The President of India is head of the executive branch, under Articles 52 and 53, with the duty of preserving, protecting and defending the constitution and the law under Article 60. Article 74 provides for a Prime Minister as head of the Council of Ministers, which aids and advises the president in the performance of their constitutional duties. The council is answerable to the lower house under Article 75(3).

The constitution is considered federal in nature, and unitary in spirit. It has features of a federation (a codified, supreme constitution, a three-tier governmental structure [central, state and local], division of powers, bicameralism and an independent judiciary) and unitary features such as a single constitution, single citizenship, an integrated judiciary, a flexible constitution, a strong central government, appointment of state governors by the central government, All India Services (the IAS, IFS and IPS) and emergency provisions. This unique combination makes it quasi-federal in form.^[51]

Each state and union territory has its own government. Analogous to the president and prime minister, each has a governor or (in union territories) a lieutenant governor and a chief minister. Article 356 permits the president to dismiss a state government and assume direct authority if a situation arises in which state government cannot be conducted in accordance with constitution. This power, known as president's rule, was abused as state governments came to be dismissed on flimsy grounds for political reasons. After the S. R. Bommai v. Union of India decision,^[52][53] such a course of action is more difficult since the courts have asserted their right of review.^[54]

The 73rd and 74th Amendment Acts introduced the system of panchayati raj in rural areas and Nagar Palikas in urban areas.^[13]Article 370 gives special status to the state of Jammu and Kashmir.

Constitution and legislature

Amendments

Amendments are additions, variations or repeal of any part of the constitution by Parliament.^[55] The procedure is detailed in Article 368. An amendment bill must be passed by each house of Parliament by a two-thirds majority of its total membership when at least two-thirds are present and vote. Certain amendments pertaining to the constitution's federal nature must also be ratified by a majority of state legislatures. Unlike ordinary bills in accordance with Article 245 (except for money bills), there is no provision for a joint session of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha to pass a constitutional amendment. During a parliamentary recess, the president cannot promulgate ordinances under his legislative powers under Article 123, Chapter III. Deemed amendments to the constitution which can be passed under the legislative powers of parliament were invalidated by Article 368(1) in the Twenty-fourth Amendment.^[55]

By July 2018, 124 amendment bills had been presented in Parliament; of these, 103 became Amendment Acts.^[56] Despite the supermajority requirement for amendments to pass, the Indian constitution is the world's most frequently-amended national governing document.^[57] The constitution is so specific in spelling out government powers that many amendments address issues dealt with by statute in other democracies.

In 2000, the Justice Manepalli Narayana Rao Venkatachaliah Commission was formed to examine a constitutional update. The government of India establishes term-based law commissions to recommend legal reforms, facilitating the rule of law.

Limitations

In Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala, the Supreme Court ruled that an amendment cannot destroy what it seeks to modify; it cannot tinker with the constitution's basic structure or framework, which are immutable. Such an amendment will be declared invalid, although no part of the constitution is protected from amendment; the basic structure doctrine does not protect any one provision of the constitution. According to the doctrine, the constitution's basic features (when 'read as a whole') cannot be abridged or abolished. These 'basic features' have not been fully defined,^[50] and whether a particular provision of the constitution is a 'basic feature' is decided by the courts.^[58]

The Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala decision laid down the constitution's basic structure:^[59]

1. Supremacy of the constitution
2. Republican, democratic form of government
3. Its secular nature
4. Separation of powers
5. Its federal character^[59]

This implies that Parliament can only amend the constitution to the limit of its basic structure. The Supreme Court or a high court may declare the amendment null and void if this is violated, after a judicial review. This is typical of parliamentary governments, where the judiciary checks parliamentary power.

In its 1967 Golak Nath v. State of Punjab decision, the Supreme Court ruled that the state of Punjab could not restrict any fundamental rights protected by the basic structure doctrine.^[60] The extent of land ownership and practice of a profession, in this case, were considered fundamental rights.^[61] The ruling was overturned with the ratification of the 24th Amendment in 1971.^[61]

Constitution and judiciary

The judiciary is the final arbiter of the constitution.^[62] Its duty (mandated by the constitution) is to act as a watchdog, preventing any legislative or executive act from overstepping constitutional bounds.^[63] The judiciary protects the fundamental rights of the people (enshrined in the constitution) from infringement by any state body, and balances the conflicting exercise of power between the central government and a state (or states).

The courts are expected to remain unaffected by pressure exerted by other branches of the state, citizens or interest groups. An independent judiciary has been held as a basic feature of the constitution,^[64][65] which cannot be changed by the legislature or the executive.^[66]

Judicial review

Judicial review was adopted by the constitution of India from judicial review in the United States.^[67] In the Indian constitution, judicial review is dealt with in Article 13. The constitution is the supreme power of the nation, and governs all laws. According to Article 13,

1. All pre-constitutional laws, if they conflict wholly or in part with the constitution, shall have all conflicting provisions deemed ineffective until an amendment to the constitution ends the conflict; the law will again come into force if it is compatible with the constitution as amended (the Doctrine of Eclipse).^[68]
2. Laws made after the adoption of the constitution must be compatible with it, or they will be deemed void ab initio.
3. In such situations, the Supreme Court (or a high court) determines if a law is in conformity with the constitution. If such an interpretation is not possible because of inconsistency (and where separation is possible), the provision which is inconsistent with the constitution is considered void. In addition to Article 13, Articles 32, 226 and 227 provide the constitutional basis for judicial review.^[69]

Due to the adoption of the Thirty-eighth Amendment, the Supreme Court was not allowed to preside over any laws adopted during a state of emergency which infringe fundamental rights under article 32 (the right to constitutional remedies).^[70] The Forty-second Amendment widened Article 31C and added Articles 368(4) and 368(5), stating that any law passed by Parliament could not be challenged in court. The Supreme Court ruled in Minerva Mills v. Union of India that judicial review is a basic characteristic of the constitution, overturning Articles 368(4), 368(5) and 31C.^[71]

Flexibility

According to Granville Austin, 'The Indian constitution is first and foremost a social document, and is aided by its Parts III & IV (Fundamental Rights & Directive Principles of State Policy, respectively) acting together, as its chief instruments and its conscience, in realising the goals set by it for all the people.'^[i][72] The constitution has deliberately been worded in generalities (not in vague terms) to ensure its flexibility.^[73]John Marshall, the fourth Chief Justice of the United States, said that a constitution's 'great outlines should be marked, its important objects designated, and the minor ingredients which compose those objects be deduced from the nature of the objects themselves.'^[74] A document 'intended to endure for ages to come',^[75] it must be interpreted not only based on the intention and understanding of its framers, but in the existing social and political context.

The 'right to life' guaranteed under Article 21^[A] has been expanded to include a number of human rights, including the right to a speedy trial,;^[3][76] the right to water;^[3][77] the right to earn a livelihood,^[3] the right to health,^[3] and the right to education.^[78]

At the conclusion of his book, Making of India's Constitution, retired Supreme Court of India justice Hans Raj Khanna wrote:

If the Indian constitution is our heritage bequeathed to us by our founding fathers, no less are we, the people of India, the trustees and custodians of the values which pulsate within its provisions! A constitution is not a parchment of paper, it is a way of life and has to be lived up to. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty and in the final analysis, its only keepers are the people.'^[79]

See also

Notes

1. ^The Constitution of India was originally written in Hindi and English, so, both Hindi and English are its 'original' languages.
2. ^ ^abThe Constitution of Yugoslavia briefly held this position from 1974 until it split up in 1990.
3. ^Although the last article of the constitution is Article 395, the total number in March 2013 was 465. New articles added through amendments have been inserted in the relevant location of the original constitution. To not disturb the original numbering, new articles are inserted alphanumerically; Article 21A, pertaining to the right to education, was inserted by the 86th Amendment Act.
4. ^The Constitution was in 22 Parts originally. Part VII & IX (older) was repealed in 1956, whereas newly added Part IVA, IXA, IXB & XIVA by Amendments to the Constitution in different times (lastly added IXB by the 97th Amendment).
5. ^By 73rd & 74th Amendment, the lists of administrative subjects of Panchayat raj & Municipality included in the Constitution as Schedule 11 & 12 respectively in the year 1993.
6. ^Scheduled Areas are autonomous areas within a state, administered federally and usually mainly populated by a Scheduled Tribe.
7. ^Scheduled Tribes are groups of indigenous people, identified in the Constitution, who are struggling socioeconomically
8. ^Originally Articles mentioned here were immune from judicial review on the ground that they violated fundamental rights. but in a landmark judgement in 2007, the Supreme Court of India held in I.R. Coelho v. State of Tamil Nadu and others that laws included in the 9th schedule can be subject to judicial review if they violated the fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 15, 19, 21 or the basic structure of the Constitution {(ambiguous)} – I.R. Coelho (dead) by L.Rs. v. State of Tamil Nadu and others(2007) 2 S.C.C. 1
9. ^These lines by Granville Austin from his book The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation at p. 50, have been authoritatively quoted many times

Notes on Article 21

1. ^Art. 21 – 'No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law'

References

1. ^Original edition with original artwork - The Constitution of India. New Delhi: Government of India. 26 November 1949. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
2. ^'Preface, The constitution of India'(PDF). Government of India. Retrieved 5 February 2015.
3. ^ ^{abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyzaaabacad}Krithika, R. (21 January 2016). 'Celebrate the supreme law'. The Hindu. N. Ram. ISSN0971-751X. OCLC13119119. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
4. ^ ^abPylee, Moolamattom Varkey (1994). India's Constitution (5th rev. and enl. ed.). New Delhi: R. Chand & Company. p. 3. ISBN978-8121904032. OCLC35022507.
5. ^ ^abNix, Elizabeth (9 August 2016). 'Which country has the world's shortest written constitution?'. History. A&E Networks. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
6. ^'The Constitution of India: Role of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar'. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015.
7. ^'Constitutional supremacy vs parliamentary supremacy'(PDF). Retrieved 12 October 2015.
8. ^'Introduction to Constitution of India'. Ministry of Law and Justice of India. 29 July 2008. Retrieved 14 October 2008.
9. ^Swaminathan, Shivprasad (26 January 2013). 'India's benign constitutional revolution'. The Hindu: opinion. Retrieved 18 February 2013.
10. ^Das, Hari (2002). Political System of India (Reprint ed.). New Delhi: Anmol Publications. p. 120. ISBN978-8174884961.
11. ^WP(Civil) No. 98/2002 (12 September 2002). 'Aruna Roy & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors'(PDF). Supreme Court of India. p. 18/30. Retrieved 11 November 2015.
12. ^'Preamble of the Constitution of India'(PDF). Ministry of Law & Justice. Retrieved 29 March 2012.
13. ^ ^{abcdefghijklmnopqr}Dhavan, Rajeev (26 November 2015). 'Document for all ages: Why Constitution is our greatest achievement'. Hindustan Times. OCLC231696742. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
14. ^Menon, V.P. (15 September 1955). The story fo the integration of the India states. Bangalore: Longman Greens and Co. access-date= requires url= (help)
15. ^'Commencement'.
16. ^ ^{abcdefghijklmn}Yellosa, Jetling (26 November 2015). 'Making of Indian Constitution'. The Hans India. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
17. ^ ^abcd'The Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings):(9th December,1946 to 24 January 1950)'. The Parliament of India Archive. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
18. ^Laxmikanth, M. 'INDIAN POLITY'. McGraw-Hill Education. Retrieved 6 April 2019 – via Google Books.
19. ^DelhiNovember 26, India Today Web Desk New; November 26, 2018UPDATED:; Ist, 2018 15:31. 'Constitution Day: A look at Dr BR Ambedkar's contribution towards Indian Constitution'. India Today. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
20. ^'Denying Ambedkar his due'. 14 June 2016. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
21. ^'Constituent Assembly of India Debates'. 164.100.47.194. Retrieved 6 April 2019.
22. ^ ^abPatnaik, Biswaraj (26 January 2017). 'BN Rau: The Forgotten Architect of Indian Constitution'. The Pioneer. Bhubaneswar: Chandan Mitra. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
23. ^'Archived copy'. Archived from the original on 20 February 2012. Retrieved 13 June 2013.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
24. ^ ^abcde'Celebrating Constitution Day'. The Hindu. Internet Desk. N. Ram. 26 November 2015. ISSN0971-751X. OCLC13119119. Retrieved 26 July 2018.CS1 maint: others (link)
25. ^'Archived copy'. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 12 May 2014.CS1 maint: Archived copy as title (link)
26. ^ ^ab'Some Facts of Constituent Assembly'. Parliament of India. National Informatics Centre. Archived from the original on 11 May 2011. Retrieved 14 April 2011. On 29 August 1947, the Constituent Assembly set up a Drafting Committee under the Chairmanship of B. R. Ambedkar to prepare a Draft Constitution for India
27. ^On National Law Day, saluting two remarkable judges, Firstpost, 26 November 2011.
28. ^PM Modi greets people on Constitution Day, DNA India, 26 November 2015.
29. ^'November 26 to be observed as Constitution Day: Facts on the Constitution of India'. India Today. 12 October 2015. Retrieved 20 November 2015.
30. ^'Original unamended constitution of India, January, 1950'. Retrieved 17 April 2014.
31. ^'THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) ACTS'. India Code Information System. Ministry of Law, Government of India. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
32. ^Bahl, Raghav (27 November 2015). 'How India Borrowed From the US Constitution to Draft its Own'. The Quint. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
33. ^Sridhar, Madabhushi. 'Evolution and Philosophy behind the Indian Constitution (page 22)'(PDF). Dr.Marri Channa Reddy Human Resource Development Institute (Institute of Administration), Hyderabad. Retrieved 22 October 2015.
34. ^Lockette, Tim (18 November 2012). 'Is the Alabama Constitution the longest constitution in the world?Truth Rating: 4 out of 5'. The Anniston Star. Josephine Ayers. Retrieved 24 July 2018.
35. ^'Constitution of india'. Ministry of Law and Justice, Govt. of India.
36. ^'NOTIFICATION'(PDF). egazette.nic.in. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
37. ^Baruah, Aparijita (2007). Preamble of the Constitution of India: An Insight and Comparison with Other Constitutions. New Delhi: Deep & Deep. p. 177. ISBN81-7629-996-0. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
38. ^Chishti, Seema; Anand, Utkarsh (30 January 2015). 'Legal experts say debating Preamble of Constitution pointless, needless'. The Indian Express. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
39. ^'Forty-Second Amendment to the Constitution'. Ministry of Law and Justice of India. 28 August 1976. Retrieved 14 October 2008.
40. ^Part I
41. ^Part II
42. ^Part IV
43. ^Part V
44. ^Part VI
45. ^Part VII
46. ^Part VIII
47. ^Part IX
48. ^Part IXA
49. ^http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/amend/amend97.pdf
50. ^ ^abMenon, N.R. Madhava (26 September 2004). 'Parliament and the Judiciary'. The Hindu. Retrieved 21 November 2015.
51. ^M Laxmikanth. '3'. Indian Polity (4th ed.). McGraw Hill Education. p. 3.2. ISBN978-1-25-906412-8.
52. ^Krishnakumar, R. ''Article 356 should be abolished''. Frontline (Vol. 15 :: No. 14 :: 4–17 July 1998). Retrieved 9 November 2015.
53. ^Rajendra Prasad, R.J. ''Bommai verdict has checked misuse of Article 356''. Frontline (Vol. 15 :: No. 14 :: 4–17 July 1998). Retrieved 9 November 2015.
54. ^Swami, Praveen. 'Protecting secularism and federal fair play'. Frontline (Vol. 14 :: No. 22 :: 1–14 Nov. 1997). Retrieved 9 November 2015.
55. ^ ^ab'Pages 311 & 312 of original judgement: A. K. Roy, Etc vs Union Of India And Anr on 28 December, 1981'. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
56. ^name='amendments'
57. ^Krishnamurthi, Vivek (2009). 'Colonial Cousins: Explaining India and Canada's Unwritten Constitutional Principles'(PDF). Yale Journal of International Law. 34 (1): 219. Archived from the original(PDF) on 4 March 2016.
58. ^Dhamija, Dr. Ashok (2007). Need to Amend a Constitution and Doctrine of Basic Features. Wadhwa and Company. p. 568. ISBN9788180382536. Retrieved 17 June 2014.
59. ^ ^abaDvantage. 'Doctrine of Basic Structure – Constitutional Law'. www.legalserviceindia.com. Retrieved 26 January 2016.
60. ^Jacobsohn, Gary J. (2010). Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 52. ISBN9780674047662.
61. ^ ^abDalal, Milan (2008). 'India's New Constitutionalism: Two Cases That Have Reshaped Indian Law'. Boston College International Comparative Law Review. 31 (2): 258–260. Retrieved 5 March 2015.
62. ^Mehta, Pratap Bhanu (2002). Hasan, Zoya; Sridharan, E.; Sudarshan, R. (eds.). Article – The Inner Conflict of Constitutionalism: Judicial Review and the 'Basic Structure' (Book – India's Kiving Constitution: Ideas, Practices, Controversies) ((2006)Second Impression (2002)First ed.). Delhi: Permanent Black. p. 187. ISBN81-7824-087-4. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
63. ^Bhattacharyya, Bishwajit. 'Supreme Court Shows Govt Its LoC'. the day after (1–15 Nov 2015). Archived from the original on 5 May 2016. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
64. ^National Comionmission to Review the Working of the Constitution. 'A Consultation Paper on the Financial Autonomy of the Indian Judiciary'. Chapter 1. New Delhi (26 September 2001). Retrieved 5 November 2015.
65. ^Chakrabarty, Bidyut (2008). Indian Politics and Society Since Independence: Events, Processes and Ideology (First ed.). Oxon(UK), New York (USA): Routledge. p. 103. ISBN978-0-415-40867-7. Retrieved 5 November 2015.
66. ^Sorabjee, Soli J. (1 November 2015). 'A step in the Wrong Direction'. The Week. Retrieved 12 November 2015.
67. ^Venkatesan, V. (10–23 March 2012). 'Three doctrines'. Frontline. Vol. 29 no. 05. ISSN0970-1710. Retrieved 26 July 2018.
68. ^Jain, Mahabir Prashad (2010). Indian Constitutional Law (6th ed.). Gurgaon: LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur. p. 921. ISBN978-81-8038-621-3. OCLC650215045.
69. ^Lectures By Professor Parmanad Singh, Jindal Global Law School.
70. ^Jacobsohn, Gary (2010). Constitutional Identity. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press. p. 57. ISBN978-0674047662. OCLC939085793.
71. ^Chandrachud, Chintan (6 June 2015). 'India's deceptive Constitution'. The Hindu. N. Ram. ISSN0971-751X. OCLC13119119. Retrieved 26 July 2018.
72. ^Raghavan, Vikram (2010). 'The biographer of the Indian constitution'. Seminar. Retrieved 13 November 2015.
73. ^Dharmadhikari, Justice D. M. 'Principle of Constitutional Interpretation: Some Reflections'. (2004) 4 SCC (Jour) 1. Retrieved 6 November 2015.
74. ^McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 407 (U.S. Supreme Court 1819). Text
75. ^McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. (4 Wheaton) 316, 415 (U.S. Supreme Court 1819). Text
76. ^Gaur, K. D. (2002). Article – Law and the Poor: Some Recent Developments in India (Book – Criminal Law and Criminology). New Delhi: Deep & Deep. p. 564. ISBN81-7629-410-1. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
77. ^Narain, Vrinda. 'Water as a Fundamental Right: A Perspective from India'(PDF). Vermont Law Review. 34:917: 920. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
78. ^Khosla, Madhav (2011). 'Making social rights conditional: Lessons from India'(PDF). I•con (2010). 8 (4): 761. doi:10.1093/icon/mor005. Retrieved 10 November 2015.
79. ^Khanna, Hans Raj (2008). Making of India's constitution (2nd ed.). Lucknow: Eastern Book Co (published 1 January 2008). ISBN978-81-7012-108-4. OCLC294942170.

Bibliography

• Khanna, Justice H.R (2015). Making of India's Constitution (2nd Edition 2008, (Reprinted 2015) ed.). Eastern Book Company. ISBN978-81-7012-188-6.
• Austin, Granville (1999). The Indian Constitution: Cornerstone of a Nation (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN978-01-9564-959-8.
• Austin, Granville (2003). Working a Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN978-01-9565-610-7.
• Baruah, Aparajita (2007). Preamble of the Constitution of India : An Insight & Comparison. Eastern Book Co. ISBN978-81-7629-996-1.
• Basu, Durga Das (1965). Commentary on the constitution of India : (being a comparative treatise on the universal principles of justice and constitutional government with special reference to the organic instrument of India). 1–2. S. C. Sarkar & Sons (Private) Ltd.
• Basu, Durga Das (1984). Introduction to the Constitution of India (10th ed.). South Asia Books. ISBN0-8364-1097-1.
• Basu, Durga Das (1981). Shorter Constitution of India. Prentice-Hall of India. ISBN978-0-87692-200-2.
• Das, Hari Hara (2002). Political System of India. Anmol Publications. ISBN81-7488-690-7.
• Dash, Shreeram Chandra (1968). The Constitution of India; a Comparative Study. Chaitanya Pub. House.
• Dhamija, Dr. Ashok (2007). Need to Amend a Constitution and Doctrine of Basic Features. Wadhwa and Company. ISBN9788180382536.
• Ghosh, Pratap Kumar (1966). The Constitution of India: How it Has Been Framed. World Press.
• Jayapalan, N. (1998). Constitutional History of India. Atlantic Publishers & Distributors. ISBN81-7156-761-4.
• Khanna, Hans Raj (1981). Making of India's Constitution. Eastern Book Co. ISBN978-81-7012-108-4.
• Rahulrai, Durga Das (1984). Introduction to the Constitution of India (10th ed.). South Asia Books. ISBN0-8364-1097-1.
• Pylee, M.V. (1997). India's Constitution. S. Chand & Co. ISBN81-219-0403-X.
• Pylee, M.V. (2004). Constitutional Government in India. S. Chand & Co. ISBN81-219-2203-8.
• Sen, Sarbani (2007). The Constitution of India: Popular Sovereignty and Democratic Transformations. Oxford University Press. ISBN978-0-19-568649-4.
• Sharma, Dinesh; Singh, Jaya; Maganathan, R.; et al. (2002). Indian Constitution at Work. Political Science, Class XI. NCERT.
• 'The Constituent Assembly Debates (Proceedings):(9th December,1946 to 24 January 1950)'. The Parliament of India Archive. Retrieved 22 February 2008.

External links

• 'Constitution of India'. Commonwealth Legal Information Institute. – online copy

• 13Number of 'Articles' in the Constitution

Background[edit]

The 2nd paragraph of the section Background seemed out of place. The 1st sentence of the 2nd paragraph did not make any sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.125.196.228 (talk) 18:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Socialism?[edit]

Is there any more specific source/reference/info on socialism in the Indian Constitution? Any info would be welcome for the development of the Socialism in India article. --Soman (talk) 15:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

the preamble shown is outdated, please update[edit]

the words socialist and secular is missing and they were added later.so plz. upload a a updated preamble —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.205.130.186 (talk) 14:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Renamed section 'Features' to 'Phylosophy'[edit]

Still working on this section. I will need some more time. Anyone willing to contribute, are most welcome. Sumanch (talk) 08:27, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Suggested Merger[edit]

I believe merger of official language with the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution of India will be more appropriate.Sumanch (talk) 00:04, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Criticism of the Indian Constitution - Recommend removal of subjective material from the article[edit]

The author of this section has advanced subjective criticisms and equally subjective justifications for these 'criticisms'. I recommend that this section be removed from this article as it is not in the spirit of Encylopedia.

Unwieldy- An unwieldy book for one may not be so for the other. The argument works both ways.
Unrepresentative - A verifiable criticism - however, unless this criticism is backed up by verifiable non-representation, this would not hold water.
Alien - A verifiable criticism - as we can have specific instances of borrowing from different constitutions. But, someone knowledgeable might be able fish out 'original thought', or 'innovative borrowing', in the constitution. --Naresh (talk) 17:55, 17 April 2008 (UTC)nice page

It's been a couple of months since this complaint has first been leveled and no one has responded. While I'm far from an expert on the matters of Indian law, this section reads as a systematic defense of the constitution rather than a balanced perspective on criticisms that have been leveled. On this account, I'm going to go ahead and delete the section.

--Ben (talk) 17:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Well i believe that the criticism were justified in a sense but yes you are right that there was no reference or basis for the same and epecially with the NPOV policy of wikipedia it was worth deleting them. Nonetheless I suggest that we can keep the same in the talk page for future discussion and if someone can come out with the references of the same, we may as well put them back in the main article. What say?Tarun2k (talk) 12:23, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

I won't stop you from keeping the criticisms in the talk section, but I found relatively little value in the section. It read like a rather simplistic essay designed to defend the Indian constitution from its critics rather than a discussion of criticisms. That being said, the general subtopics and introduction to the criticisms was acceptable, so perhaps someone could work with the existing section and create a respectable one. I don't know, do as you wish.

--Ben (talk) 19:45, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

800 Pound Gorilla[edit]

How come there is no mention that the Constitution of India is a barely disguised version of the Government of India Act of 1935? The Act of 1935 is the single most important antecedent, far more important that all the other constitutions so extensively paid homage to. It needs not only to be section 1.1 of the History, but also to be mentioned in the lead. Its absence here is surprising, since it is mentioned in many of the references cited in this article. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:19, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

For example, M. V. Pylee, in his Constitutional Government in India, says on the first page of text (p. 3), 'The makers of the India Constitution drew .. especially much from the British-made Government of India Act of 1935. Thus the Constitution of India is the result of considerable imitation and adaptation rather than of originality.' Then again two pages later, 'The Constitution derives directly from the Government of India Act, 1935, many of its provisions almost verbatim.' Fowler&fowler«Talk» 11:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, but what is it?[edit]

How come there is a whole article on the constitution of India and yet no author has yet bothered to include a link to the actual constitution?Would that not be relevant?Please don't tell me that there is no English language electronic copy of it anywhere.

Edward Carson (talk) 00:58, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Check the external links section I am invariant under co-ordinate transformations (talk) 04:02, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi Carson,You can check the link to the 'The constitution of India' to read fully at the following URL:http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Constitution_of_India— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vivek1717 (talk • contribs) 10:14, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Structure of the Union Government[edit]

I am sugesting removal of this section. This is an opinion of Dr. Ambedkar on what the executive branch of the Govt should be like. I believe it is more appropriate in the Govt. of India page than the constitution. Structure of the Union Government has been included in the Preamble. Sumanch (talk) 23:53, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Dr.Rajendra.Prasad.jpg[edit]

The image File:Dr.Rajendra.Prasad.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --07:26, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Page moves needed for amendment articles[edit]

As an anon I can't do this myself. The titles now are currently inconsistent. Here they are:

Thirty-eighth Amendment to the Indian Constitution

Thirty-ninth Amendment of the Indian Constitution

Forty-second amendment of the Indian Constitution

First Amendment of the Constitution of India

(1) Should 'Amendment' be capitalized, yes or no?

(2) Is the amendment 'to' or 'of' the constitution?

(3) Is the amendment to the 'Indian Constitution' or the 'Constitution of India'? 24.64.165.129 (talk) 16:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

Missing from the Constitution[edit]

There is no practical remedy against Judiciary of India. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.205.59.128 (talk) 05:45, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

New amendments are missing Lovelynikku (talk) 06:45, 29 September 2018 (UTC)

Number of 'Articles' in the Constitution[edit]

There is a discrepancy in the number of 'articles' -- the overview section says there are 440 articles, but the section 'structure' says there are 448 articles. This needs to be corrected.

Also, when the constitution came into effect, there were only 395 articles.

It needs to be explained how new articles are added and how they came to be 440/448 as on date.

Even as on date, the official website for the government of India has the latest (2007) version of the constitution of India in PDF format -- and it has only 395 articles listed in 22 parts. (Do articles 371A, 371B, 371C, etc. count as different articles?)

No authentic information seems to be available online. Any expert in this area / published book sources may be useful in clearing up this confusion.

Raghuveer 16:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raghuveer.v (talk • contribs)

[edit]

Subsequent to the above comment, I referred to the official website -- http://indiacode.nic.in/coiweb/coifiles/part.htm

I copied all the contents pages into excel and counted them.

Note that article 232 was omitted in 7th amendment (230,231,232 were replaced by rephrased 230,231)

Also note that when a new article is inserted through an amendment, it is given a non-numeric number. Example: if a new article had to be inserted between 2 and 3, it was called '2A'. Some articles were repealed (deleted) through amendments.

Now as per my reckoning,

No. of original articles: 395No. of articles added (with non-numeric designations): 81No. of articles repealed (deleted): 33NET number of articles in effect as on date: 395+81-33=443

Request someone to please cross-verify this and update as necessary.

Some pages which do quote this number:http://books.google.co.in/books?id=5ugDAAAAMBAJ&pg=PT56&lpg=PT56&dq=indian+constitution+%22443+articles%22&source=bl&ots=Ph9t0sEvpI&sig=wvP6QZq28Vebqy2xxatGpUyUg40&hl=en&ei=sk7HS_mzH8H-8AagwcD7Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CBMQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=indian%20constitution%20%22443%20articles%22&f=false

ThanksRaghuveer 17:49, 15 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raghuveer.v (talk • contribs)

File:Preamble to Constitution of India.pdf Nominated for Deletion[edit]

Inputs needed[edit]

Around 12-13 'Parts of the Constitution of India' articles exist now, can be seen here Constitution_of_India#Parts. This one was at AFD, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Part One of the Constitution of India and the result was 'delete without prejudice'. And most of these articles are stub with 3-5 lines. I think as we already have these pages at Wikisource, we don't need them here at English Wikipedia? -- ɑηsuмaη^{« ৳ᶏ ɭϞ »} 09:05, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Indian Constitution an overview[edit]

This fork has been proposed for deletion. Bearian (talk) 13:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

List of 'notable constitutional lawyers'[edit]

I removed this section and was reverted by Amit.pratap1988, so I am bringing it here for discussion per WP:BRD. I think such a list is too much of a tangent that does not belong in this article. If it was to appear as a separate list in a different article, would be the inclusion criteria? It is such a subjective list, I think it distracts from the main topic, which is a very important article. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 07:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Athomeinkobe, I'm in favour of removing all names, but as of now I edited that list. Kept only very notable lawyers. Hope it will be accepted. Problem is that, in future anyone can add any name in that section. So it will be better to remove that section. --Human3015 Say Hey!! • 07:52, 26 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello guys Notable constitutional Lawyers of India need is relevant to constitution of India as these guys were among Constitutional expert.yes I agree not everyone should be added instead well known should be added.Amit.pratap1988 (talk) 08:30, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Amit.pratap1988 (talk) 16:36, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

IMazing 2.8.2 Keygen is smarter, sharing an awesome management tool. It creates for PC and Mac to manage own data. After all, the user can easily share any file from phone to PC. All in all, this is for iPad, iPod, and iPhone.

@Amit.pratap1988 and Athomeinkobe:, don't you think that these names can be taken as WP:PROMOTION. As I earlier said that i'm in favour of removing this list of names. These lawyers are still working as lawyers and including their names in article of Constitution of biggest democracy in world can increase their weightage. People who are seeking for lawyer for their legal matters can prefer to choose these lawyers by seeing their name in article of Constitution of India. These lawyers can also ask for extra fees. So I'm completely against this list. Constitution is much bigger thing than these lawyers. There were and there will be thousands of such constitutional lawyers. I see no logic to mention their names. Whoever started this section must having intention of promotion. --Human3015 Say Hey!! • 18:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

@Human3015:, I agree that promotional is one of the potential problems. But my bigger concern is about setting eligibility criteria for the list. For example, the articles on the American and Australian constitutions do not have such lists, because they are simply innappropriate. We started this discussion two days ago, so let's wait for more comments. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 01:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

In the last 24 hours an IP user has tried to add Pranshu Pande (twice) and Pranjal Pande to the list of 'notable lawyers'. However, searching for these names in Google does not give any immediate evidence that there is a 'notable constitutional lawyer' with one of those names. That is the problem with these lists - once it exists, people keep adding names, which often don't belong. That is another reason for saying that having no list at all is the better option. AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 08:03, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Update required?[edit]

An IP recently posted 'Please update latest news related to parts and shedule.' under the list of schedules. Have there been any additions or changes that need to be identified in the article? AtHomeIn神戸 (talk) 05:10, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Created by it[edit]

@SourceOhWatch (SrotahaUvacha): The source you have cited don't have any phrases like 'didn't exist before' and 'created by it'. How does this support the statement? - Kautilya3 (talk) 00:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: There is no need of any reference as the preamble of the Constitution itself is claiming like that. In the earlier constitution of British India, were there prime minister, president, parliament, etc. In British India constitution, viceroy is the supreme power and there was no elected member of parliament.183.82.199.109 (talk) 09:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

The Constitution is a WP:PRIMARY source, and we are not allowed to interpret it. You definitely need an authoritative secondary source that says what has been claimed. I am removing the addition. It should not be re-added until reliable sources are presented and consensus is reached. - Kautilya3 (talk) 11:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: If you are so authoritative, you can remove as you like. But at least give authoritative secondary source contradicting what is written earlier. All the content is interpretations only depending on personal views/selections when treated in absolute manner. If your views are applied, most of the content in the article is to be deleted or innumerable references are to be given. The content in this article is far better than what it was three months earlier. Wikipedia has to decide whether to settle for substandard content or personal views of those authoritative persons. 183.82.199.109 (talk) 16:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

I have deleted the questionable content as per the Wikipedia policy on verifiability. There is no point debating it without producing a reliable source. - Kautilya3 (talk) 16:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: You were not contributor of the content of this 'Page' not even a single word till now. How come you want to be at deciding level unilaterally without showing secondary source. You also do not want to reply the queries raised. If you do not agree with some content insert a note asking for suitable reference such that every reader knows about the abjection raised and apply their mind to judge the validity of the content or the 'objection note'. That is the better way of resolving the difference of opinions till a suitable solution/consensus is reached. I am doing so on your behalf. Thanks.183.82.199.109 (talk) 16:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia is not a debating forum. There is no point in discussing our 'opinions' without having reliable sources at hand. It is fine to retain the content with a dubious tag, for now. But please look for sources if you want the content retained. - Kautilya3 (talk) 17:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

The constitution and the federalism[edit]

'Article 1 of the constitution declares that India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States. Constitution mainly devised two level federal system with states at second level. The powers conferred by the constitution to the states can not be overridden by the Union/ federal government. It is the duty of the Union to ensure that the government of every State is carried on in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution per Article 355 and shall not take any action which would impede governance of a state according to the Constitution. When a State has failed to work according to the Constitution, President’s rule is imposed till the situation is rectified under Article 356 and President takes over its (the State’s) administration with post facto consent of the Parliament per Article 357. Supreme court shall adjudicate the disputes between a state and centre or other states.'

@Kautilya3: has deleted the above content placed by me in the article page saying unsourced and not relevant to the subject of the Article. The content source is given by referencing to the articles on the Constitution. Please indicate which sentence needs further reference. More over he is claiming Federalism is not relevant subject to to be added in the Page. Federalism is part of the basic structure of the constitution. Content restored back and @Kautilya3: needs to give proper acceptable reply to revert my content. 183.82.199.109 (talk) 11:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

The Constitution is a WP:PRIMARY source. It is not allowed to provide your own analysis of what is in it.

Secondly, this page is about the Constitution, not a discussion of what is written in it. See Constitution of the United States for a guide to what should be written on this page.

Finally, when an edit is reverted, you need to follow WP:BRD and achieve consensus on the talk page before reinstating it. At the moment, you are WP:EDITWARring. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

In line with your explanation of what should be covered in this page, please indicate whether Section 'The constitution and the judiciary' should be deleted from the Page. Why are two different yard sticks? Real and plain meaning of the articles is added and it is termed as analysis of a individual. Articles 1 to 7 (including sub clauses and their contents) are discussed in the Constitution of the United States. Why are you misleading by citing incorrect references?

Please express your analysis of the quoted articles of the constitution and cite objectionable intent in my content. When subject is the topic of discussion, a senior and supposed to be knowledgeable editor need not take cover of his interpretation of dos and donts of content editing. It seems many WP editors like a situation of reverting graffiti /vandalism of content where content is blatantly vandalised frequently instead of overseeing content's quality enhancement. Enhancing the content is not the motive. 183.82.199.109 (talk) 20:00, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

'The constitution and the judiciary' section is describing the role played by the judiciary in interpreting and upholding the constitution. It is not talking about the 'duties of the judiciary' like you have tried to do in your addition. You show serious misunderstandings of how this article should be developed. In this article, the constitution is the subject, and we are writing about it. We don't use the constitution as a source to describe something else, such as the government or the judiciary etc. Pining SpacemanSpiff and RegentsPark to see if they can explain to you better. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 24 July 2016[edit]

Structure

The Indian constitution is the world's longest constitution.^{[Note 1]} At the time of commencement, the constitution had 395 articles in 22 parts and 8 schedules. It consists of almost 80,000 words. The Constitution, in its current form (September 2012), consists of a preamble, 25^{[Note 2]} parts containing 448Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page). On 'special status' to Maharashtra and Gujarat

^[1] On 'special status' to Nagaland

^[2] On 'special status' to assam

^[3] On 'special status' to manipur

1000 ways to make 1000 dollars book pdf download. ^[4] On 'special status' to Andhra Pradesh

^[5] On 'special status' to Sikkim

^[6] On 'special status' to Mizoram

^[7] On 'special status' to Arunachal Pradesh

I hope to start with these citations and work from thereMhveinvp (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Download lagu qosidah duhai senangnya pengantin baru mp3. References

1. ^'Article 371A in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
2. ^'Article 371B in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
3. ^'Article 371C in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
4. ^'Article 371D in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
5. ^'Article 371F in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
6. ^'Article 371G in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
7. ^'Article 371H in The Constitution Of India 1949'. indiankanoon.org. Retrieved 2019-04-03.
8. ^link, Get; Facebook; Twitter; Pinterest; Email; Apps, Other. 'Article 371I Constitution of India'. Retrieved 2019-04-03.

Semi-protected edit request on 20 April 2019[edit]

Image was wrong

https://www.google.com/search?biw=1920&bih=916&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=kaa6XPWiApicvQSd_ZngBg&q=indian+constitution+original&oq=indian+constitution+original&gs_l=img.3.0l3j0i8i30l3j0i24l4.31163.35729.36020..0.0.0.108.773.8j1...1..1.gws-wiz-img....0i67.E84mCweVdtM#imgrc=CrwZ2jOS_l_fqM:

Not done: a) no actual request made, and b) the current lead image of the article (which I am assuming is the one to which you are referring) is an image of the preamble to the constitution. See [1]NiciVampireHeart 22:09, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Cite error: There are <ref group=Note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist group=Note}} template (see the help page).